Time Off Work for Illness is No Vacation, or Is It? California businesses with 50 or more employees must comply with the federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). For eligible employees, both acts are essentially “you will have your job waiting for you” laws. Neither FMLA nor CFRA […]
California Businesses Must Reimburse for Employment-Related Use of Personal Vehicles, Phones and More A California employer must reimburse the expenses its workers “necessarily” incur as part of their jobs (Labor Code Section 2802). On the other hand, a business generally has no such obligation for an employee’s costs that enables him or her to appear […]
EEOC Supplies New Rules that May Limit Claims A business subject to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (those with 20 or more persons on payroll) must ensure it terminates, disciplines or denies benefits to any “older” employee (40 years or more) on “reasonable factors other than age ” (RFOA). Workplace discrimination claims […]
Recent Federal Guidelines on Preventing Discrimination It is nearly a given that employers will ask for an applicant’s criminal conviction record in the hiring process. However, past guilt for a crime is not always a legitimate factor in the employment decision. For example, a conviction for a decades-old traffic offense might well be irrelevant on […]
Clear, Written Workplace Policies are Essential There is no California law requiring a business to pay its employees for time off work, whether for vacation, holidays, sick time, or any other reason. However, employers do commonly have policies and plans that provide such compensation. Once a company opts to provide any such benefits, California does […]
All California Agreements Must be in Writing by 2013 As we have reported, in a few short months (by January 1, 2013), California Labor Code section 2751 will require all businesses to ensure employee commission agreements are in writing. See, “Employee Sales Commissions: California Requires Written Agreements by End of 2012.” While it is a […]
The California Supreme Court has promptly followed its game-changing Brinker decision with another important ruling, specifically limiting the rights of workers to collect attorney fees from their employers in lawsuits over allegedly missed meal breaks and rest periods. As we reported in “Brinker: California’s Meal Break Breakthrough, Employers are No Longer the Lunch Police,” California […]
The Necessity of Management Training While the California Supreme Court’s Brinker decision (April 12, 2012) supplied vital and sensible guidelines that do not require employers to act as a “police” authority confirming workers take their meal and rest breaks, the law will still impose penalties on a business if its supervisors and managers, for lack […]
Yet, Greater Flexibility Requires Greater Documentation The recent California Supreme Court Brinker decision (April 12, 2012) on the standards for providing meal and rest breaks now permits greater flexibility on scheduling, including employer ability to provide workers the option to skip breaks from time-to-time. However, an employer should take care to institute and maintain written […]
Dos and Don’ts for California Employers The California Supreme Court’s recent Brinker decision (April 12, 2012) includes important clarifications on employee meal breaks as well as rest periods. To ensure compliance, employers must maintain accurate timekeeping systems for employee working hours. Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and similar California law, employers are […]