With the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion, controversial politics is again taking national center stage, potentially in the workplace.
For decades, California has recognized the validity of “rounding” employee hours to the nearest five minutes, one-tenth or quarter hour, plus or minus, as an “efficient” and “practical” way to calculate pay as long as the practice did not deprive workers of their compensation over time. However, electronic technology’s advances may reduce rounding to an historical relic.
California minimum wage is currently $14.00/hour for employers with 25 or fewer employees and $15.00 for employers with 26 or more. Governor Newson has projected an across-the-boards increase to $15.50/hour on January 1, 2023.
By survey, as many as one in three women have experienced workplace sexual harassment over their careers, with less than 20% ever reporting the matter to management. A 2021 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission report found California’s incidence to be significantly higher than the national average.
Workplace policy manuals (handbooks) often include a progression of employee classifications, such as probationary/introductory, regular, full-time, part-time, temporary, leased, exempt from overtime, and non-exempt from overtime.
While logic might suggest no need to reimburse an employee with unlimited minutes for business use of her or his phone, California follows different reasoning.
An employer should not underestimate the importance in confirming and preserving in writing “at-will” employment. Most states, including California, permit the employment relationship to end at the will of either the employer or the employee at any time unless the parties have agreed otherwise. Ambiguity can thus put management at a significant disadvantage.
Akin to a speeding ticket, a former (or current) worker’s demand to see his employment records will likely come in due time to any employer. If the request arrives on an attorney’s letterhead, it will probably seek to create pressure by citing deadlines imposed by one or another California laws. Knowing the score – including ability to see when that lawyer is overreaching – can reduce the stress of the process.
If an employee misses one or more off-duty meal breaks by the press of a day’s work, California Labor Code 226.7 requires the employer to pay an additional one-hour “break premium.” The same is true for any day that work demands cause an employee to miss one or more off-duty rest breaks.
On investigating a worker’s death at Valero Refinery of Benicia, Cal/OSHA cited the refinery and three contractors $1,753,375 for willful and serious safety violations. Serious violations are hazards posing “a realistic possibility . . . of death or serious physical harm.” Willful violations are failures to “remediate a known hazard” or knowing violations of the law.